Saturday, June 14, 2025

Slouching Toward Authoritarianism?

By Andrew P. Napolitano - June 14, 2025 at 11:29AM

The deployment of California National Guard troops and active-duty U.S. Marines onto the streets of Los Angeles is an assault on federalism, violates federal law and manifests a dangerous pattern of governmental behavior in defiance of constitutional principles and the rule of law.

None of this was the case until President Donald Trump, against the express wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, federalized the CA National Guard, became their commander in chief, and ordered them to thwart both lawful and unlawful demonstrators in Los Angeles.

There, agents of the U.S. Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were attempting to make warrantless arrests of persons whom they and their colleagues believed were unlawfully present in the U.S. Demonstrators soon arrived, some of whom peaceably assembled and vociferously objected to the arrests, and some of whom attempted to interfere with them violently.

Clearly, acts of physical interference with even unlawful arrests are themselves unlawful, but condemning government behavior, waving Mexican flags, cheering on those who have been arrested, even standing in the way of federal agents until ordered to move are all protected acts of expression and historically recognized acts of civil disobedience.

The conflicts between some — not all — demonstrators and federal agents at times grew violent, and local and state authorities ordered police to protect the federal agents and keep the demonstrators at bay — but not silence them — while the feds carried out their tasks.

Then the president ordered in the federalized National Guard and then — almost unimaginably — he ordered in active-duty Marines. The sight of active-duty armed troops confronting unarmed persons exercising their constitutionally protected freedom of expression, and the declaration of no free speech zones, was and is gut wrenching, un-American and without lawful precedent in modern times.

Here is the backstory.

The Constitution makes the president the commander in chief of U.S. troops and of state National Guard units when the latter are called into federal service by Congress or by the president. In numerous statutes, Congress has defined when and under what circumstances the president may command state military personnel.

The latter are familiar to most Americans. They are part-time civilian/soldiers, our neighbors, none of whom are on active duty but for a few administrators, and they are typically deployed unarmed to assist local law enforcement when asked by a state governor. We have all seen them selflessly helping rescue folks and delivering aid after natural disasters.

Can National Guard troops be used for law enforcement? That depends on who summons them.

Congress addressed this in numerous federal statutes, enacted in 1792, 1794, 1795 and again in 1807. The essence of these laws permits the president to declare himself the commander in chief of the National Guard for law enforcement purposes only when asked by a state governor. Short of the gubernatorial request, the Guard may not be summoned by the president for law enforcement purposes, except in the cases of invasion or rebellion.

Who is in charge of law enforcement?

The Constitution retains the police power in the states. The Supreme Court has ruled that regulations and enforcement of them for health, safety, welfare and morality are presumptively state functions that were not delegated to the feds when the 13 states formed, and later when the 37 states joined, the Union. This is the principle of state sovereignty, otherwise known as federalism.

Federalism was reinforced dramatically as recently as 1997 in a case called Printz v. U.S. There, Congress enacted gun regulations and ordered the states to enforce them. In an opinion by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, which invalidated the statute, the court reinforced federalism — the primacy of the states in matters of safety and the immunity the states enjoy from federal takeovers.

Congress itself has also spoken to this, though not in the modern era. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 — part of the compromise that ended so-called Reconstruction in the Southern states — absolutely prohibits the use of federal troops for law enforcement purposes unless the governor has requested them, or unless in the case of invasion or rebellion. The modern Congress has defined “rebellion” as collective acts of violence intending to overthrow or substantially destabilize the government.

Thus, we can see that federalizing of the National Guard — which transforms them into federal troops — actually disables them from performing law enforcement duties which they could lawfully have performed when under Gov. Newsom’s command. Moreover, since there is no invasion or rebellion as the laws define them, there is no lawful basis for all these troops on the streets.

This is not constitutional hairsplitting. This is very serious business. If the feds can characterize an unarmed assemblage of protesters as an invasion merely because they are angry, carry a foreign flag and prefer a foreign language — all protected speech — and engage in civil disobedience, and thus justify the use of military force against them, whose freedoms are safe?

The government argues that the current state of affairs in Los Angeles constitutes an emergency and thus it has broad powers to address it. That is constitutional hogwash.

The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that there is no emergency exception in the Constitution unleashing the government. Even during the War Between the States — though ruling afterward — the court found that the government retains the obligation to abide and recognize all liberties protected by the Bill of Rights. The emergency argument is not only unconstitutional but extra-constitutional. It was crafted by those who reject their oaths to preserve, protect and defend the supreme law of the land.

Thomas Jefferson wrote that the purpose of government is to secure our liberties, not to look for ways to assault them. Are we slouching toward authoritarianism? NO. The events in Los Angeles are one giant leap in that lamentable irreversible direction.

To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https://JudgeNap.com.
COPYRIGHT 2025 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



from Ron Paul Institute Featured Articles

via IFTTT

No comments:

Post a Comment

Merchandise

Ron Paul America Cloud

Site Credits

Ron Paul America

is voluntarily affiliated with

Liberty Operations Group

______________________________

Site created, maintained and hosted by

Liberty Web Services

Tags

Constitution Individual Liberty Liberty Report Ron Paul Ron Paul Institute ronpaulinstitute.org #TurnOnTheTruth 2008 2012 4th amendment 911 ACTION Afghanistan war Agency Aggression Principle al-Qaeda Alan Colmes Alert America America's Fault Americans antigun AR 15 assault weapon Audit Authoritarian bailouts Believe Big Brother big government bill of rights Blame blowback bubbles Bush Campaign for Liberty Career Politician Eric Cantor Central Bank Charity China churches collapse Collectivism Commission committee Compassion Congress Conservative constitution Crash dangerous person Democrat Democrats Donald Trump Donald Trump. Planned Parenthood drones economic Economy Edward Snowden End the Fed European Union Federal Reserve Floyd Bayne floyd bayne for congress force foreign interventionism free market free markets GOP Nominee GOP Presidential Debates Government Great Depression gun control House of Representatives housing bubble HR 1745 I like Ron Paul except on foreign policy If ye love wealth better than liberty IFTTT Individual Individualism Institute Irag Iran Iraq war ISIL ISIS Judge Andrew Napalitano libertarian Liberty Liberty Letters Liberty Report Lost mass Media meltdown metadata Micheal Moore Middle East Mitt Romney nap National Neocons New Ron Paul Ad New York Times Newsletters Newt Gingrich No Non non-interventionism NSA NSA Snooping Obama Overreach overthrow Patriot Act peace Peace and Prosperity politicians Pope Francis President Presidential Presidential Race programs prosperity Race Racist Racist Newsletters Rand Paul Read the Bills Act recessions redistribution of wealth refugee crisis Repeal Obamacare Report Republican Republican Nomination Republican Nominee Republicans Revolution Rick Santorum Rick Santorum Exposed Ron Ron Paul Ron Paul Institute Ron Paul Institute Featured Articles Ron Paul Institute for Peace And Prosperity Ron Paul Institute Peace and Prosperity Articles Ron Paul Next Chapter Media Channel Ron Paul Racist Newsletters ron paul's foreign policy Ronald Reagan ronpaulchannel.com ronpaulinstitute.org Rosa DeLauro russia Samuel Adams Saudi Arabia Second Amendment Security Senate Senator September 11th attacks Show Soviet Spying stimulate Stock Market surveillance Syria tech bubble terrorist The the Fed the poor US US foreign policy Us troops USA Freedom Act Virginia Virginia Republican Primary voluntarism. Liberty Voluntary Warner Warning warrantless wiretaps YouTube