Saturday, August 26, 2017

One Way to End Drug War Violence

By Jacob G. Hornberger - August 26, 2017 at 12:38PM


Two police officers in Kissimmee, Florida, were recently shot and killed while investigating illegal drug activity in a dangerous part of town. According to the New York Times, government officials praised the officers for their service and asked Floridians to pray for other law-enforcement personnel. President Trump weighed in with a tweet in which he offered his thoughts and prayers for the Kissimmee police and their families.

There is one big thing about that picture, however: It is the drug war itself, which Trump and, no doubt, most of the Kissimmee police department, favor, that is the reason that those two police officers are dead. If drugs were legal, those two dead police officers would not have been investigating illegal drug activity because there would be no illegal drug activity.

Take a look at this very interesting and revealing article in yesterday’s New York Times about a DEA agent named Enrique Camarena. He too is dead, having been kidnapped, tortured, and murdered in 1985 by a Mexican drug gang. Not surprisingly, the DEA went ballistic over the murder and pulled out all the stops, including violent kidnapping, to bring the malefactors to justice.

One big thing to notice, however: It is the drug war itself, which most DEA agents favor, that brought about Camarena’s death. If drugs had been legal, Camarena wouldn’t have been in Mexico investigating illegal drug activity because there wouldn’t have been any illegal drug activity.

Consider this article from yesterday’s Washington Post, entitled “Acapulco is Now Mexico’s Murder Capital.” Why are there so many murders in Acapulco? Because of the drug war. If drugs were legal, there would be no more drug-war murders in Acapulco because there would no longer be a drug war.

In the early days of the drug war, proponents could innocently say, “We had no idea that drug laws would produce violence and, therefore, we are not really responsible, in a moral sense, for the consequences of this government program that we support.”

However, after decades of drug-law experience, no one can innocently make that claim. Drug laws have brought into existence drug gangs, drug lords, drug cartels, and drug violence, much like alcohol Prohibition brought into existence Al Capone and his spree of violence. At some point, the proponent of drug laws loses his innocence and must inevitably acknowledge that he himself is morally culpable for the death and destruction that accompanies a government program that he himself supports.

Mexico used to be a wonderful place to visit. And a safe place. American tourists in Acapulco and other parts of Mexico didn’t have to worry about drug-war violence because there was no drug war. The drug war changed all that. It converted Mexico into a hell-hole of violence, much like it has done in the Philippines.

Ever since the 1960s, we have become accustomed to those great big, well-publicized drug busts, especially when they involve some big drug lord. When that happens, there are all sorts of accolades for drug enforcement officers. They almost always call it a watershed event in the war on drugs. They send drug lords to jail for decades.

And then something interesting happens. The drug war goes on, as if nothing had happened. Those great big drug busts have had no effect on the drug-war process. The NYT article about Camarena explains why this is so. As soon as they bust a drug lord or a drug cartel, he or it is immediately replaced by new drug lords or drug cartels. If they are busted, they’re replaced by still more. The process is endless because the more they crack down, the higher the profits that are to be made from drug deals. The higher profits inevitably attract more unsavory and more violent people into the business.

There is only one way to put these people out of business, and it isn’t more drug busts and more criminal prosecutions. That one way is drug legalization. Legalizing drugs means no more black market, no more drug lords, and no more drug gangs or cartels. They immediately go out of business because they cannot compete in a legalized market. So, all the cops who are currently being killed investigating illegal drug activity will no longer be killed because there won’t be any more illegal drug activity to investigate.

The best thing Mexican officials could do for the Mexican people is to legalize drugs. Legalizing drugs would bring an immediate end to all the drug-war violence in Mexico. It’s what drug lords, drug gangs, and drug cartels fear most because they know that drug legalization would put them out of business immediately. Sure, US officials would be livid and would scream to the rafters in protest. But drug legalization would restore a peaceful society to Mexico, one that American tourists would soon start returning to.

Why would US officials be so angry? Because the drug war has become big business for many in the federal bureaucracy. You’ve got an enormous bureaucratic army of judges, prosecutors, law enforcement personnel, clerks, and CIA agents whose livelihood depends on the drug war. They know that if drugs were legalized, many of them would be twiddling their thumbs with nothing to do, which is precisely why they continue to support the drug war knowing full well that dead law-enforcement officers come with it.

Reprinted with permission from the Future of Freedom Foundation.

from Ron Paul Institute Featured Articles


No comments:

Post a Comment


Ron Paul America Cloud

Site Credits

Ron Paul America

is voluntarily affiliated with

Liberty Operations Group


Site created, maintained and hosted by

Liberty Web Services


#TurnOnTheTruth 2008 2012 4th amendment 911 ACTION Afghanistan war Agency Aggression Principle al-Qaeda Alan Colmes Alert America America's Fault Americans antigun AR 15 assault weapon Audit Authoritarian bailouts Believe Big Brother big government bill of rights Blame blowback bubbles Bush Campaign for Liberty Career Politician Eric Cantor Central Bank Charity China churches collapse Collectivism Commission committee Compassion Congress Conservative constitution Crash dangerous person Democrat Democrats Donald Trump Donald Trump. Planned Parenthood drones economic Economy Edward Snowden End the Fed European Union Federal Reserve Floyd Bayne floyd bayne for congress force foreign interventionism free market free markets GOP Nominee GOP Presidential Debates Government Great Depression gun control House of Representatives housing bubble HR 1745 I like Ron Paul except on foreign policy If ye love wealth better than liberty IFTTT Individual Individualism Institute Irag Iran Iraq war ISIL ISIS Judge Andrew Napalitano libertarian Liberty Liberty Letters Liberty Report Lost mass Media meltdown metadata Micheal Moore Middle East Mitt Romney nap National Neocons New Ron Paul Ad New York Times Newsletters Newt Gingrich No Non non-interventionism NSA NSA Snooping Obama Overreach overthrow Patriot Act peace politicians Pope Francis President Presidential Presidential Race programs prosperity Race Racist Racist Newsletters Rand Paul Read the Bills Act recessions redistribution of wealth refugee crisis Repeal Obamacare Report Republican Republican Nomination Republican Nominee Republicans Revolution Rick Santorum Rick Santorum Exposed Ron Ron Paul Ron Paul Institute Ron Paul Institute Featured Articles Ron Paul Institute for Peace And Prosperity Ron Paul Institute Peace and Prosperity Articles Ron Paul Next Chapter Media Channel Ron Paul Racist Newsletters ron paul's foreign policy Ronald Reagan Rosa DeLauro russia Samuel Adams Saudi Arabia Second Amendment Security Senate Senator September 11th attacks Show Soviet Spying stimulate Stock Market surveillance Syria tech bubble terrorist The the Fed the poor US US foreign policy Us troops USA Freedom Act Virginia Virginia Republican Primary voluntarism. Liberty Voluntary Warner Warning warrantless wiretaps YouTube